Sorry for the long delay, but I was really distracted by other activities.
In Nara, the ancient capital of Japan, I had the honour to present a lecture at ICBEN2014. The facts presented indicate that the human auditory system has elaborate strategies to avoid noise-induced injury. Unfortunately these mechanisms are mostly not effective for impulses, particularly if they are extremely short and their pressure-time-history has the structure of a dagger. The pressure-time-history of acoustic impulses stimulate resonances of middle-ear structures, which in turn can permanently damage the organ of Corti in typical ways. – Masking effects are important, as well as training by the long-term acoustic environment. Middle-ear muscles have no protective functions, but they serve as an auditory equivalent of the visual task of accommodation.
It can be summarized that auditory training is very important for good sensitivity of hearing and that particularly very short impulses can be most harmful for hearing, and a cause for tinnitus.
Currently the ISO1999 is the basis for the protection of hearing, practically everywhere. It is based on the assumption that the acoustic energy received by the ear is the key parameter. However, the facts do not support this assumption. Orchestra musicians hear much better than nomadic people, and an extremely short impulse can permanently ruin the ear, even if it transmits only a small amount of energy. For effective auditory protection the basics of this standard should be replaced by principles derived from studies on human experience.
The so-called change of the millennium – from the year 1999 to 2000 – was celebrated worldwide in the form of popular and huge events that were visually impressive but also associated with harmful noise. In order to get a hold on auditory effects of these events, a study was performed, covering five consecutive new-year celebrations in Germany, including Millennium-Celebrations. Results were surprising.
The auditory system is extremely sensitive. In order to survive it developed impressive strategies to avoid, or reduce, damages caused by noise. This article, based on a contribution to the Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU, Trondheim) attempts to present some aspects of this fascinating topic.
Life is full of manifold activities and events, some pleasant and others
repelling. Hearing is important for everyone, and thus the auditory
system has to be able to adapt to extremely different conditions. Some
people lead a nomadic life in remote areas, sitting in the grass with a
few animals, and are practically not exposed to any technical noise.
Others are visiting discotheques regularly, for decades, and race with
motorbikes, while a classmate works in a library and collects stamps.
Looking into books on ear and hearing the authors invariably
point out how extremely sensitive our sense of hearing is, and this is
certainly correct. However, keeping in mind how many people pay lots
of money to be at the side of the road at automobile races, at the
airport during air shows and stunts, or near the stage in open-air
concerts, it is apparent that the hearing system must have protective
mechanisms to avoid – or minimize – noise-induced auditory damage.
The ear has to be able to hear and follow the bumble-bee, flying from
flower to flower, Fig. 1, but it must also withstand the acoustic
emission from cut-off grinders, hammer-drills and other popular tools.
To get an understanding of the plasticity and bio-technical finesse of
the functional components involved in hearing, it is useful to see what
solutions some other mammals with a highly effective auditory system
have come up with. Of course, not everything will be presented and
discussed here, but the topics covered may help to understand that our
hearing system is highly regulated and devoted to avoid damages of
various kinds. As a result of its long evolutionary efforts , it
appears to be amazingly farsighted and intelligent.
In 2002 an article was published on auditory performance of persons living in remote parts of the PR China. The study was performed in cooperation with the ENT Department of FMM university in Xian. Most of the persons examined were not exposed to technical noise, but a few of them had to endure extreme levels of noise, over a long time. Contrary to common assumptions, it could not be confirmed that persons not exposed to technical noise are hearing better than persons living in loud cities. Furthermore, it was apparent that acute acoustic trauma was wide spread, caused by fire crackers and other devices resulting in powerful impulses. The equal-energy-concept that is the basis for auditory protection does not explain these findings.
In November 2010 I had the pleasure to give a lecture at the International Convention of Sound Designers on the marvelous capabilities of the human ear. The meeting took place at the Congress Center in Leipzig, Germany. One of the reasons for this topic is the fact that the EU-standards for protecting the ear at the workplace create much trouble for sound designers. The acoustic conditions at their work places are declared harmful, but sound designers hear much better than the normal population. This discrepancy is caused by wrong assumptions of the standard.
Here is the abstract.
Studies on the auditory performance of entire groups of persons reveal that people ex-
posed to low sound levels do not generally hear better than those living and working in
loud acoustic conditions. Hence, the basis for world-wide standards to protect the ear
are incorrect and insufficient. Reason for this are powerful neural mechanisms of the
auditory system that is working hard to prevent noise-induced auditory damage and to
optimize various aspects of hearing. Studying special conditions at the workplace, as
well as at places related to hobbies and other activities, indicates the existence of several
such functional components. Overall sensitivity of hearing can apparently be reduced in
loud environments. Anticipating exposure to short loud events the auditory system can
rapidly reduce the sensitivity. Masking effects of low frequencies can be scaled down in
order to focus on high frequencies. Strong low-frequency components protect against si-
multaneous high-frequency noise. Very short impulses are more harmful than longer ones.
Most dangerous are rarely occurring unexpected powerful impulses. Auditory threshold
and threshold of pain are both subject to training. Damage caused by impulses result in
characteristic forms of audiograms. — The auditory neural system can be damaged or
reprogrammed by a single powerful impulse.
The article is published under the CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 license.
Discussing situations involving sound or noise, everyone assumes that our ears are functioning basically like microphones, detecting physical parameters such as pitch and loudness. However, our auditory system is enormously more powerful and elaborate than that. Continue reading →
Why children’s toys?
Damages to hearing, caused by noise, do not heal, and so they are called permanent. Hence, such injuries pile up. Protecting the ear of children can delay – or even avoid – the development of such a „damage pile“. Adults working in loud industries, or serve in the military, have experts that care about their environment, an advantage children do not have.
The auditory system
It consists of the two ears plus parts of the central nervous system, a marvelously effective neural machinery. Continue reading →
Since about four decades I am engaged in research on ear and hearing. During the last quarter century as professor of Justus-Liebig-University, founded in 1607, and located in Giessen, Germany. Results of the work of our team, and myself have been published in a variety of printed media, as well as presented at maybe hundred congresses and scientific meetings in wide parts of the world. Noise-induced auditory damage is widespread, all over the world, and therefore it is necessary to improve protective measures. Official rules and procedures for noise, at the workplace and for hobbies and play, are apparently insufficient Continue reading →